"Ideological Collaborator with Enemy is a category of Ethics and Esthetics. Terrorism is immoral and ugly, regardless of its intentions. It is ethically wrong to surrender to Terrorism, and politically, economically, socially, culturally appease it, and collaborate with terrorists. In addition to being ethically wrong, it is esthetically appalling to beautify Terrorism in any form and any shape in arts, and abusing "fredom of speech", publicly praise enemy by using mass media. It is easy to recognize Ideological Collaborator with enemy. One who expresses views, thoughts, opinions pleasing enemy and/or demands actions in any way helping to achieve enemy's strategic goals is Ideological Collaboratlor with enemy." Boris Tiraspolsky Quotations and Maxims
There is a great deal of difference between appeasing enemy at a time of Peace
and coraborating with enemy at a time of War.
The most notorious example of appeasing enemy was British PM Neville Chamberlain.
PM Neville Chamberlain could be qualified as Ideological Collaborator with Enemy.
Collaboration with enemy at a time of War is high treason.
The most famous case of collaboration with enemy at a time of war was
Vidkun Quisling, Minister President in occupied Norway from February 1942 to the end of World War II.
Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling
His surname has become an eponym for "traitor", especially a collaborationist.
In some European languages, the term "quisling" has become a synonym for traitor, particularly one who collaborates with invaders.
The term was invented by the British newspaper The Times
in article of April 15, 1940, which was entitled "Quislings everywhere".
The article asserted: "There are Quislings in every country in Europe."
In almost seventy years one may assert that there are Quislings not only in Europe.
