American  Ideological Society

     Modules
· Home
· Content
· Encyclopedia
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Journal
· Private Messages
· Publish
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Surveys
· Your Account

     Who's Online
There are currently, 43 guest(s) and 1 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

     Languages
Select Interface Language:


 .: Terrorist-enabling and criminal-friendly garments

Security of the Nation


 




"I have previously called for a ban on "these hideous, unhealthy, socially divisive, terrorist-enabling, and criminal-friendly garments" from public places. ...I reiterate that call. Islam requires that women wear neither niqab nor burqa, while public welfare emphatically requires their public prohibition. How many more cases of robbery and terrorism must occur for this common-sense stricture to be applied from Afghanistan and Jordan to the United Kingdom and Philadelphia?" - Daniel Pipes



"To remind, both garments are designed for the modesty of Muslim females;
the niqab covers all but the eyes and the burqa covers the entire face."

Continued...


President Obama said: "One of those values is the freedom to practice your religion -- a right that is enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution.  Nashala Hearn, who joins us from Muskogee, Oklahoma, took a stand for that right at an early age.  When her school district told her that she couldn't wear the hijab, she protested that it was a part of her religion.  The Department of Justice stood behind her, and she won her right to practice her faith.  She even traveled to Washington to testify before Congress.  Her words spoke to a tolerance that is far greater than mistrust -- when she first wore her headscarf to school, she said, "I received compliments from the other kids." (The White House - Press Office - Remarks by the President at Iftar Dinner).

Comments by Daniel Pipes: 

I wrote... in a blog for National Review Online, that the niqab and burqa should both be banned on security grounds, "as one cannot have faceless persons walking the streets, driving cars, or otherwise entering public spaces."

Although a problem with historic roots (Iraqi irregulars disguised themselves in the Palestinian town of Deir Yassin in 1948), this... will document the current dangers, especially in the West, of the burqa and niqab as a disguise. (Read more: Niqabs and Burqas as Security Threats :: Daniel Pipes).

What's new on the niqab and burqa front? 

In "Ban the Burqa – and the Niqab Too," two years ago, I documented how these two items pose criminal and terrorist dangers. Is that still the case? (Read more: Niqabs and Burqas - The Veiled Threat Continues :: Daniel Pipes).



 
     Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

     Related Links
· More about Security of the Nation
· News by editor


Most read story about Security of the Nation:
The Nation Under Terrorist Siege


     Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


     Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


Associated Topics

Casualties of Ideological War

"Terrorist-enabling and criminal-friendly garments" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register




Copyright 2007-2010 American Ideological Society
PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.13 Seconds